DEMONSTRATION REPORT
This is a sample report showing the structure and type of analysis available through TWOCLICKS Site Climate Analysis.
Data shown represents actual historical ranges for the Phoenix metro area from government sources.
Production reports will include real-time data and expanded analysis.
Executive Summary
Phoenix, AZ
33.4484 N, 112.0740 W
Maricopa
Phoenix Metro Area presents a high operational cost environment driven primarily by extreme heat exposure.
The region experiences 100+ days annually above 100 degrees F, directly impacting cooling infrastructure requirements and energy costs
for data centers and industrial facilities.
Key considerations for site development: Water availability is a strategic concern, with ongoing drought conditions
affecting long-term resource planning. Wildfire risk exists in surrounding areas but direct urban exposure is moderate.
Seismic activity is minimal. Monsoon season (June-September) brings flash flood risk requiring drainage infrastructure planning.
Bottom line: Phoenix is viable for development but requires explicit planning for heat mitigation, water security,
and elevated operational costs compared to temperate locations.
Risk Assessment Overview
Extreme Heat
9.2
SEVERE
Drought / Water
7.8
HIGH
Wildfire Exposure
5.4
MODERATE
Flash Flooding
5.1
MODERATE
Severe Storms
4.2
MODERATE
Seismic Activity
1.8
LOW
Primary Risk Factor: Extreme heat is the dominant climate consideration for Phoenix.
Facilities must plan for cooling costs 40-60% higher than temperate locations and potential equipment
stress during peak summer months.
Extreme Heat Analysis
Phoenix consistently ranks among the hottest major metropolitan areas in the United States.
The urban heat island effect amplifies regional temperatures, with nighttime lows often remaining above 90 degrees F during peak summer.
Days Above 100 degrees F (Annual Avg)
107 days
10-year average (2014-2024)
Days Above 110 degrees F (Annual Avg)
21 days
10-year average (2014-2024)
Record High Temperature
122 degrees F
June 26, 1990
Cooling Degree Days (Annual)
4,289 CDD
vs. 1,200 national average
10-Year Temperature Trend
Annual Extreme Heat Days - Phoenix Metro
Chart showing days above 100 degrees F and 110 degrees F by year (2014-2024)
Year
Days Above 100 degrees F
Days Above 110 degrees F
Max Temp Recorded
2024
113
29
118 degrees F
2023
119
31
119 degrees F
2022
101
18
115 degrees F
2021
108
22
118 degrees F
2020
102
19
117 degrees F
2019
98
15
116 degrees F
2018
104
21
117 degrees F
2017
111
26
119 degrees F
2016
99
17
118 degrees F
2015
105
19
116 degrees F
Operational Impact: In June 2017 and June 2024, Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport temporarily
halted flights when temperatures exceeded aircraft operational limits. Facilities dependent on outdoor
equipment or worker exposure must plan for operational constraints during peak heat events.
Implications for Development
HVAC/Cooling: Plan for cooling capacity 40-60% above temperate-climate baselines
Energy Costs: Summer electricity demand peaks significantly; consider on-site generation or storage
Equipment Ratings: Ensure all outdoor equipment rated for 120 degrees F+ operation
Pavement/Surfaces: Specify heat-resistant materials to prevent degradation
Drought and Water Availability
Maricopa County has experienced persistent drought conditions as part of a broader megadrought affecting the
American Southwest. Water availability is a critical long-term consideration for any facility with significant
water requirements, including data centers using evaporative cooling.
Current Drought Status
D2
Severe Drought (USDM Classification)
Arizona Drought Coverage
73 %
Percent of state in drought
U.S. Drought Monitor Classification
Classification
Description
Current Status
D0
Abnormally Dry
-
D1
Moderate Drought
-
D2
Severe Drought
CURRENT
D3
Extreme Drought
-
D4
Exceptional Drought
-
5-Year Drought History - Maricopa County
Drought Intensity Over Time
Chart showing weekly drought classification (D0-D4) from 2020-2024
Water Strategy Consideration: Arizona has implemented Tier 1 water shortage
declarations affecting Colorado River allocations. Facilities with high water consumption should
evaluate closed-loop cooling systems, recycled water sources, or air-cooled alternatives despite
higher energy costs.
Water Resource Factors
Lake Mead Levels: Currently at approximately 35% capacity, triggering federal shortage declarations
Groundwater: Phoenix Active Management Area restricts new groundwater pumping for certain uses
Reclaimed Water: Available for industrial cooling; requires separate infrastructure
Long-term Outlook: Climate models project continued aridification through 2050
Wildfire Exposure Analysis
While the Phoenix urban core has low direct wildfire ignition risk, the surrounding Sonoran Desert
and mountain areas experience regular fire activity. Smoke exposure, evacuation route impacts, and
power infrastructure vulnerability are relevant considerations.
Fires Within 50 Miles (2024 YTD)
47 fires
Per NIFC incident data
Acres Burned Within 50mi (2024)
28,400 acres
Year to date
Historical Fire Activity - 50 Mile Radius
Year
Fire Count
Acres Burned
Largest Fire
2024
47
28,400
Boulder View Fire (8,200 ac)
2023
52
19,800
Diamond Fire (4,500 ac)
2022
38
41,200
Pipeline Fire (26,500 ac)*
2021
61
33,100
Telegraph Fire (12,400 ac)
2020
55
78,900
Bush Fire (36,200 ac)
*Pipeline Fire located in Flagstaff area, within 50mi radius edge
Active Fire Detection Map (Conceptual)
NASA FIRMS Fire Detections - Last 7 Days
Map showing satellite-detected thermal anomalies within 100 miles of Phoenix
Infrastructure Impact: The 2020 Bush Fire caused temporary power transmission
concerns for the Phoenix grid. Facilities should evaluate backup power resilience during regional
fire events that may affect transmission infrastructure.
Wildfire Considerations
Air Quality: Smoke events can trigger unhealthy air quality days; HVAC filtration planning recommended
Power Grid: Transmission lines from northern generation cross fire-prone terrain
Fire Season: Peak activity April-June (pre-monsoon) and September-November (post-monsoon)
Direct Risk: Urban Phoenix has low direct ignition risk; perimeter areas higher
Seismic Activity Assessment
Phoenix is located in a region of low seismic activity. Arizona does not sit on a major fault line,
and significant earthquakes are rare. This represents a favorable risk factor compared to California
or Pacific Northwest locations.
Earthquakes M2.5+ (Last 10 Years)
23 events
Within 100-mile radius
Maximum Magnitude (10 Years)
4.1 M
Minor earthquake classification
Seismic Events Within 100 Miles (2014-2024)
Date
Magnitude
Depth
Location
2023-08-14
4.1
12 km
25 mi NW of Fountain Hills
2022-11-02
3.4
8 km
18 mi E of Mesa
2021-06-19
3.1
5 km
32 mi N of Scottsdale
2020-04-28
3.8
10 km
45 mi W of Phoenix
2019-09-03
2.9
7 km
22 mi S of Tempe
Showing 5 most significant events. Full dataset available in detailed report.
Low Risk Assessment: Seismic activity is not a significant factor for Phoenix site
development. Standard construction practices are sufficient; specialized seismic engineering is not
required as it would be in California locations.
Severe Weather Analysis
Phoenix experiences a distinct monsoon season from June through September, characterized by sudden,
intense thunderstorms that can produce flash flooding, dust storms (haboobs), and damaging winds.
Outside monsoon season, severe weather is minimal.
Weather Alerts (2024 YTD)
89 alerts
Maricopa County
Flash Flood Warnings (2024)
34 warnings
Peak: July-August
Alert Distribution by Type (2024)
Alert Type
Count
Peak Season
Excessive Heat Warning
28
June-August
Flash Flood Warning
34
July-August
Severe Thunderstorm Warning
19
July-August
Dust Storm Warning
8
June-September
Monsoon Season Considerations
Flash Flooding: Desert terrain does not absorb water; drainage planning critical
Dust Storms: Haboobs can reduce visibility to zero and deposit debris on equipment
Lightning: Arizona has high lightning density during monsoon; surge protection essential
Microbursts: Sudden downburst winds can exceed 100 mph in localized areas
Infrastructure Note: Flash flood events in August 2021 caused localized road
closures and facility access issues in central Phoenix. Evaluate site drainage and access road
elevation for any development in flood-prone areas.
Summary and Recommendations
Site Viability Assessment
Phoenix Metro Area is a viable but high-cost environment for data center and industrial
facility development. The region offers low seismic risk, available land, and growing infrastructure - but
extreme heat and water scarcity create operational cost premiums that must be factored into financial models.
Key Recommendations
Risk Factor
Mitigation Approach
Priority
Extreme Heat
Over-spec cooling systems; evaluate air-cooled vs evaporative trade-offs; plan for 120F+ equipment ratings
CRITICAL
Water Scarcity
Evaluate closed-loop cooling; secure reclaimed water contracts; model long-term availability scenarios
CRITICAL
Wildfire Smoke
Enhanced HVAC filtration; air quality monitoring; worker protection protocols
MODERATE
Flash Flooding
Site elevation assessment; drainage infrastructure; access road evaluation
MODERATE
Power Resilience
On-site generation/storage; evaluate grid vulnerability during regional fire events
MODERATE
Seismic
Standard construction practices sufficient
LOW
Comparison Context
Compared to other major data center markets, Phoenix offers lower land costs and seismic risk than
California, but higher operational costs than temperate locations like Ashburn, VA or Columbus, OH.
The water situation is more constrained than most competing markets.
Financial Modeling Note: When evaluating Phoenix against alternative sites,
include a 15-25% premium for cooling-related energy costs and factor water costs as a variable
rather than fixed input given ongoing shortage declarations.
Data Sources
USGS Earthquake Hazards Program
U.S. Drought Monitor (USDM)
NOAA National Weather Service
NIFC Wildland Fire Statistics
NASA FIRMS Active Fire Data
NOAA Climate Data Online
Disclaimer
This report provides historical climate and environmental data from government sources for informational
purposes only. It is not a substitute for professional engineering assessment, environmental impact
studies, insurance underwriting, or regulatory compliance review.
Data represents historical observations and does not constitute a prediction of future conditions.
Climate patterns are subject to change. Users should conduct independent due diligence appropriate
to their specific use case and risk tolerance.
TWOCLICKS Climate Intelligence makes no warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or fitness
for any particular purpose of this report.
This demonstration report was generated in December 2024. Production reports include real-time data
integration and expanded analysis sections.