High RiskUS
Source: NASA GISS

US temperature anomalies have accelerated to 1.18°C above baseline, establishing a new persistent heat regime that threatens infrastructure and asset performance.

Risk Level

The sustained 1°C+ anomaly regime represents a material departure from historical norms that disrupts planning assumptions for most long-duration assets and operations.

📈

Trend Summary

Over five years, US temperature anomalies have increased from 0.85°C to 1.18°C, with the sharpest acceleration occurring in 2023 when anomalies jumped to 1.17°C and remained elevated through 2025. The trend shows sustained warming above 1°C for three consecutive years, indicating a structural shift rather than temporary volatility.
🔭

5-Year Projection

If the current trend continues, US temperature anomalies will likely stabilize or drift between 1.1°C and 1.3°C over the next five years, maintaining the elevated heat regime rather than reverting to pre-2022 levels. This trajectory assumes no rapid atmospheric recovery and suggests operators should plan for persistent anomalies exceeding 1°C as the new baseline.
🏗️

Asset Exposure

Power infrastructure and cooling systems face elevated stress from sustained demand spikes, while agricultural operations, water supply systems, and transportation networks built to historical temperature ranges experience increased failure risk. Insurance and real estate valuations tied to historical climate models face downside revision as the permanent heat shift reduces asset productivity and increases maintenance costs.
⚡

Forward Signal, Next 12 Months

Monitor whether 2026 anomalies exceed 1.20°C or drop below 1.00°C to determine if the warming plateau is holding or accelerating further.

Assessment generated Oct 20, 2026, 4:00 PM UTC

This is the aggregate US picture.

Your exposure depends on where your assets are, what type they are, and what decisions you are responsible for. Build a risk report specific to your situation.

Build My Risk Report →

See the underlying data

Live global surface temperature anomaly vs. 1850–1900 baseline

View Chart →